Underground Jumbo Development

Metres of advance per shift, per day and per month from the round you drill and the jumbo that drills it, plus what a metre of heading costs you.
Underground development headings only — a twin-boom drill jumbo advancing a drift, crosscut, ramp or decline by drill and blast. It is not a bench drilling tool, not a continuous miner or roadheader model, not a ground-support design, and not a ventilation design. It sizes the jumbo's share of the cycle only: mucking, charging, blasting, re-entry and the rest of the ground support happen on other machines and are not in these numbers.

A twin-boom drill jumbo at the face of an underground development heading

Step 1 — The heading

Everything downstream is per metre of this profile.

Step 2 — The round

Hole depth and pull set your advance. Nothing else in this tool moves it.

Step 3 — The jumbo cycle

Setup, drilling and support. What one face costs the machine in hours.

Step 4 — The shift

The gap between the cycle and the shift is where development schedules die.

Delays, as recorded on shift reports. These are the eight the source measured.

Step 5 — Your costs

These are yours, not the handbook's. The source is explicit that development cost is too site-specific to publish as a rate.

Step 6 — Benchmark it

A published all-in band to sanity-check what you just built up.

Why your number should be lower. The band above is all-in: it pays for the mucking, the hauling, the shotcrete and the services as well as the hole. Everything on this page is the jumbo's share of the cycle, so landing under the band is expected. Landing over it means either your rates are high or the heading is much bigger than the one the band was measured on.
metres per shift
metres per month, one jumbo, all its faces
cost per metre
StepValueWhere it comes from

The round, drawn

Where the shift goes

Rock density, if you do not know yours
RockBank density, t/m³lb/yd³

SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Table 10.4-1, p. 933, after Atkinson 1992. Bank density is the rock as it sits in the ground, before it is blasted and swells, which is the same thing Table 12.2-1 calls rock density (wet) and the right number for this page. Pick the closest rock in Step 1 and it fills itself in. This table publishes every density twice, in tonnes per cubic metre and pounds per cubic yard, and the two agree across all 37 rows to within 1.7%, the gap being the book rounding the pounds column to the nearest hundred. The printed page also carries swell, fillability and digability columns; they describe loading the broken rock rather than drilling it, so they are deliberately not reproduced here.

What a jumbo drills, and how fast
Drilling methodDiameter, mmTypical depth, m Rate, m/minRate, m/hAccuracy, cm/m

SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Table 7.2-1, p. 439. The metres per minute column is converted from the printed metres per hour, because m/min is the unit Table 12.2-2 states penetration rate in. The printed footnote is what makes these numbers mean the same thing as the field in Step 3: "drilling rates are for actual drilling and do not include time for drill retraction, boom relocation, collaring, etc. Drilling rates decrease as rock mass strength increases and may increase or decrease depending on the number and orientation of joints/blocks." This page counts boom relocation and collaring separately, as boom setup per hole, so do not fold them into the rate as well or you pay for them twice. The surface crawler and down-the-hole rows on the printed page are for bench drilling and are left out. Note that the worked example drills a 3.05 m round, shorter than the 4 m these rows quote as typical.

The published example, table by table
Physical development parameterMeasurement

SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Table 12.2-1, p. 1153. Loading this page reproduces every row of it. The printed overbreak is 5%, not the 5.6% our first transcription carried: 22.5 m² × 2.8 t/m³ × 1.05 gives the printed 66.2 t/m exactly, and 5.6% does not. Read off the printed page and corrected.

Jumbo cycle componentMeasurement

SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Table 12.2-2, p. 1154. Two rows here are printed values this tool does not reproduce and does not use: drill metres per engine hour, and average penetration rate per boom. Neither follows from the other cells on the page — the boom rate comes out at 0.93 m/min on every route through the table we could find, against a printed 0.71 — so they are shown as published and left out of the chain rather than having a derivation invented for them.

Development performance componentMeasurement

SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Table 12.2-3, p. 1154. Measured at a mine where every jumbo had at least five faces available to it, so it was never waiting on a muck cycle.

Published all-in development costs
Development itemDimensions$/m$/ft

SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Table 12.5-1, p. 1220, in 2009 US dollars at ±25%, for fairly fractured and weathered ground in central Nevada requiring regular bolting with split sets on 1.2 m centres. This table publishes every rate twice, in dollars per metre and dollars per foot, and the two agree to better than 1% on all six rows above, which is an independent check that a transcription cannot pass by accident. The seventh printed row, for pump stations and shops, is deliberately not carried here: it is quoted per unit of volume, and the book's own metric column converts it with the linear foot-to-metre factor instead of the cubic one, making it roughly eleven times too small.

What a heading actually achieves
SituationAdvanceSource

All from the SME Mining Engineering Handbook, p. 1153. The single-heading numbers are the ones to hold this tool against. A model built on five available faces describes a jumbo that never waits; a decline being driven off one face is a different machine doing a different job.

What this tool does not know. It sizes the jumbo, and only the jumbo. It does not muck the round, haul it, charge it, blast it, clear the fumes, shotcrete the back or install the resin bolts, and it does not know whether your loading fleet can keep up with the tonnes it produces. It has no view on ground conditions: a fault zone slows every number on this page and nothing here will tell you that. It does not design the charge, so the explosive figure is your rate applied to the tonnage, not a powder factor. The face is taken as a plain rectangle, which is how the source models it, so a real arched profile has slightly less area than this assumes. Every published value has been checked against the printed page.

Spending more time on spreadsheets than on the job?

We build the reporting and admin automation for mining contractors, so the numbers keep themselves.

Book a 20 min call